🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.