🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to reinitiate atomic negotiations with Washington on condition that it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue worked, and revealed new appeals had come from intermediaries to reopen discussions with the US government. He asserted Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran was not yet able to authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to access struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Walking a Challenging Course

The foreign minister is treading a difficult path since Iran does not want be perceived to be proceeding from a stance of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out more resilient militarily and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material domestically that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Negotiations Suddenly Terminated

The previous five rounds of discussions between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that culminated with Donald Trump asserting the facilities had been eliminated. Subsequently, European countries employed their privilege to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could operate inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats asserted three times they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Present Situation

Iranian officials said the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be revived in various formats if negotiations resume.

The US president recently stated he had been getting signals that Iran desired to resume discussions, but confidentially Iranian officials state they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from Washington either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of passivity in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his remarks to the forum, designed to portray the US as a dominant force that exploits the concept of global regulations, Araghchi said the fortnight-long engagement showed the clash could not be resolved by armed force. He stated the strikes started with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and culminated with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were executed with total Washington understanding and coordination, making trust hard to rebuild.

Diplomacy Stays the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had fled negotiations; it was America and the European states that had consistently attempted to dictate their demands during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be active and remains the ultimate answer to settle conflicts, but its criteria, guidelines and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"In case they talk to the nation of Iran with the tone of respect and honor, they will obtain a reply in the same language."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of repair and recovery, Araghchi claimed he was confident Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We gained numerous insights from this engagement; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He continued: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to destroy, continues to exist. The facilities and gear, if destroyed, will be restored; what is important is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but failed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have developed stronger, more united, and more supportive of the leadership and the nation in the aftermath of this assault."