🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to ban social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are watching with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a rising number of countries are considering parallel bans.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our kids' innocence". The policy may be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "an measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged the legislature to enact a bill lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a related move, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to prevent their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a advisory motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a good first step," commented one European lawmaker behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a future ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Earlier, interest built behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the administration vowed to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. An organization founded by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after viewing harmful social media material contends that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are secure and fit for minors," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, legislation is largely occurring at the state level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a rule capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with any further time requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed bills demanding guardian approval for minors to open social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and calls from certain individuals to follow this example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies take a more nuanced stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this international conversation evolves, the policies of this nation and others indicate that states internationally are no longer willing to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.